Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05851
Original file (BC 2012 05851.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-05851

		COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her 30 May 2012 Fitness Assessment (FA) score be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).  

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Her FA failure was the result of the monitor/counter’s inaccurate counting of her push-ups due to distractions caused by Fitness Assessment Center (FAC) staff during her assessment.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________ ______________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in the grade of senior airman (E-4).

On 30 May 2012, the applicant participated in the contested FA and attained a composite score of 88.20; however, as she attained only 15 push-ups which is below the minimum requirement of 18 for this component, she attained an overall unsatisfactory assessment.  

On 31 May 2012, the applicant’s monitor/counter indicated he was unable to properly evaluate and count the number of push-ups she performed due to interruptions from FAC staff during her assessment.  Specifically, FAC staff repeatedly indicated the applicant was not lifting high enough or low enough for a proper push-ups.  However, he differed in their opinion.  

On 4 June 2012, the applicant participated in a FA, attaining a composite score of 91.00; as her push-up component was recorded as 26, which exceeded the minimum requirement of 18 push-ups and therefore attained an overall excellent assessment.

On 28 June 2012, the applicant’s alternate Unit Fitness Program Manager (UFPM) recommended her 30 May 2012 FA be voided due to the discrepancy in the manner of how her push-ups were counted and her re-test rating of excellent.

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request to void the contested FA; however, correcting AAFMS to reflect she was “Exempt” for the push-up component is warranted.  Based on statements from the monitor/counter and UFPM, it appears there was a discrepancy in the administration of the push-up component of the applicant’s 30 May 2012 FA.  Also, her push-up score was not consistent with the remainder of her FA history, which lends doubt as to whether she was given a fair assessment.  There is no other evidence to support removing the other remaining components.  The result of the proposed exemption would be a composite (overall) score of 93.56, an excellent rating.  

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 19 September 2013 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice warranting partial-relief.  After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s complete submission, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) to correct AFFMS to reflect the applicant was exempt from the push-up component of the 30 May 2012 FA.  We note the applicant’s monitor/counter and alternate UFPM provided supporting statements specifically indicating that the improper counting of the applicant’s push-ups was attributable to her FA unsatisfactory score.  While we note the applicant is requesting the FA score be declared void and removed from her records, we believe the remedy recommended by the Air Force OPR, which will result in a composite (overall) score of 93.56, an “Excellent” rating, constitutes full and fitting relief in this case.  Accordingly, we recommend the applicant’s record be corrected to the extent indicated below.  

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that she was exempt from the push-up component of her 30 May 2012 Fitness Assessments (FA), resulting in an overall composite score of 93.56, which constitutes an excellent rating.  

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-05851 in Executive Session on 12 December 2013, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	Panel Chair
	Member
	Member

All members voted to correct the records as recommended.  The following documentary evidence was considered:

	 Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 11 December 2012, w/atchs.
	 Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	 Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 31 August 2013,  
               w/atchs.
	 Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 September 2013.
	



                                   
                                   Panel Chair






3











Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02538

    Original file (BC 2013 02538.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    For RegAF and AGR Airmen, the FAC (or UFPM where no FAC exists) will enter the FA results in AFFMS on the 6th duty day if the Commander does not invalidate test results or no response from the Commander is received within this timeframe;” Atch 1, Para 10a. Commander memorandum, medical docs, or FAC memorandum).” ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request to remove the contested FA from AFFMS,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02580

    Original file (BC 2013 02580.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A list of the applicant’s complete FA history is as follows: Date Composite Score Cardio Rating 4 Aug 2013 33.00 17:41/0.00 Unsatisfactory *5 May 2013 26.50 INC/0.00 Unsatisfactory 14 May 2012 91.70 12:19/57.60 Satisfactory * Contested FA On 16 Dec 13, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB), on the basis of “Insufficient evidence; specifically AF Form 422 and medical...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02587

    Original file (BC 2013 02587.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his claim, the applicant has submitted a letter from his UFPM and a Standard Form 600, Chronological Record of Medical care, indicating that he had an illness, precluding him from finishing and passing the contested FA and memorandum from his UFPM (not dated) to the Force Support Squadron commander requesting removal of the contested FA from AFFMS. If an AF Form 422 is required, an additional 7 days will be allowed for the AF Form 422 to be generated and provided.” A list of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03983

    Original file (BC 2013 03983.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, the FAC waited until 45 seconds into the assessment to tell the applicant to “fix her body.” She has never failed an FA before or since the contested assessment. FAC augmentee or another member paired to accomplish muscle fitness components will monitor and count the correct number of push-ups. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Mar 14.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04530

    Original file (BC-2012-04530.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The number of sit-ups she performed during the contested FA were inaccurately counted. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial, indicating the applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03908

    Original file (BC 2013 03908.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 29 Nov 12, the applicant participated in the contested FA and failed to attain the minimum score in the cardio component. On 14 Feb 14, the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB) disapproved the applicant’s request for relief on the basis that the applicant should not have completed the contested FAs once she became injured; additionally, the applicant did not provide a commander’s invalidation memorandum invalidating contested FAs. For Regular Air Force and AGR, they will enter the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05369

    Original file (BC 2012 05369.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPSIM states that the applicant provided a memorandum from the Director, Fitness and Sports Complex at Kadena Air Base, Japan which states her staff was aware of the manufacturer’s guidance that HR monitors can cause erratic readings and have previously separated walkers after crossing the finish line to keep their distance to avoid syncing with other HR monitors worn by other walkers. After he completed the cardio component of the FA, he had a 20 minute argument with three of the FACs and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05735

    Original file (BC-2012-05735.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05735 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His fitness assessment (FA), dated 15 November 2012, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02951

    Original file (BC 2013 02951.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided documentation validating her medical condition including; an AF FM 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report; an AF FM 422 Notification of Air Force Member’s Qualification Status; a medical evaluation letter signed by her medical provider; and her Enlisted Performance Evaluation (EPR) with a close-out date of 1 Apr 13, which indicates she “Meets” the fitness standard at the close-out of her report. The applicant’s last 5 FA results are as follows: Date Composite...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05596

    Original file (BC 2012 05596.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05596 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Fitness Assessments (FA), dated 11 Jun 12 and 6 Sep 12, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). While we note the applicant’s stated request to have the entire FA removed, the Air Force office of primary responsibility has...